Feed aggregator

The Philippines has seen one of the world’s sharpest increase in petrol prices.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints, carrying around a quarter of global seaborne oil trade and significant volumes of liquefied natural gas and fertilizers.

By Alon Ben-Meir
NEW YORK, Mar 31 2026 (IPS)

Trump’s Iran war has left the Gulf shattered: US bases turned into targets, economies battered, and the “oasis” myth destroyed. Gulf rulers now confront a harsh reckoning over their reliance on Washington and the uncertain search for a new, fragile security order.

As Trump assembled major US naval and air assets in the eastern Mediterranean and the Gulf, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and others quietly urged Washington to avoid a full-scale assault on Iran, fearing a direct blowback on their territory and energy infrastructure.

Nevertheless, the US–Israeli air campaign began on February 28, 2026, without a clearly defined and publicly articulated political endgame beyond “crippling” Iran’s capabilities. This disconnect between military escalation and strategic purpose now lies at the core of Gulf leaders’ anger and sense of betrayal toward Washington.

Trump’s Strategic Miscalculation

Trump’s decision to launch joint US–Israeli strikes on Iran has produced far higher strategic costs than his administration appears to have anticipated, from energy shock and disrupted shipping to heightened regional fragmentation and anti-American sentiment.

Even if Iranian capabilities are significantly degraded, the war has exposed vulnerabilities in US power projection, unsettled allies, and invited greater Russian and Chinese diplomatic activism in the Gulf. The long-term “price” for Washington will be measured less in battlefield metrics than in diminished trust and leverage among its traditional Arab partners.

US Bases Turned to Liabilities

From a Gulf perspective, US bases in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE were meant to deter Iran and guarantee regime security; instead, they became priority targets once the war began. Iran explicitly framed its strikes on these facilities as retaliation against Washington, but their location in densely populated and economically vital areas meant that nearby civilian infrastructure also suffered severe damage.

This experience is reinforcing a view in Gulf capitals that foreign basing arrangements draw fire without delivering the reliable protection they assumed for decades.

A Nightmare Realized

Gulf leaders long warned that a war with Iran would shatter their security and economies, a nightmare that has now materialized as Iranian missiles and drones hit oil facilities, ports, power plants, and cities across the region. They blame Washington for launching the campaign and Israel for pressing to “neutralize” Iran regardless of collateral damage in neighboring Arab states.

The sense in Gulf capitals is that their caution was dismissed, while they have paid a disproportionate price in physical destruction, economic setback, disrupted exports, and heightened domestic anxiety.

Shattered Oasis Narrative

The image of Gulf hubs like Dubai, Doha, and Riyadh as insulated “oases” open to business, tourism, and investment has been badly damaged by missile alerts, strikes on ports and airports, and the closure of key sea lanes.

Restoring confidence will require visible reconstruction, enhanced civil defense, improved air and missile defenses, and credible diplomacy that lowers the perceived risk of another sudden war. Investors and tourists will demand proof that the region can manage Iran-related tensions, not just high-end events and mega-projects.

Trump’s Misreading of Iranian Escalation

Trump publicly argued that overwhelming force would quickly coerce Iran and usher in regime change while keeping fighting “over there,” yet he appears not to have anticipated the breadth of Iranian retaliation against neighboring Gulf states or a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

The IRGC’s effective shutdown of the strait, including attacks and threats against commercial shipping, has produced global energy shocks and exposed the fragility of US planning assumptions. For Gulf leaders, this underscores how inadequate Washington’s war planning was in accounting for second- and third-order consequences.

Calculated Decision Not to Retaliate

Despite heavy damage, Gulf rulers have so far avoided direct retaliation against Iran, calculating that further escalation would expose their cities and infrastructure to even more punishing strikes. Publicly, they stress restraint and international law, but privately, officials acknowledge their enduring geographic reality: they must coexist with a powerful and proximate Iran long after this US-led campaign ends.

By holding their fire, they hope to preserve space for postwar de-escalation and avoid being locked into a permanent state of open conflict.

Recasting Security Arrangements with Washington

Given their limited strategic alternatives, Gulf monarchies are unlikely to sever ties with Washington but will seek more conditional, transactional security arrangements. They are pressing for clearer US commitments on defense of their territory, better integration of regional missile defenses, and greater say over decisions that could trigger Iranian retaliation.

At the same time, they will hedge by deepening ties with China, Russia, Europe, and Asian energy importers, thereby reducing exclusive reliance on the US while keeping the American security umbrella in place.

Gulf Options to Prevent Future Conflagration

To prevent a repeat, Gulf states are also exploring limited de-escalation channels with Tehran, tighter regional crisis hotlines, and revived maritime security arrangements that include non-Western actors such as China and India. They may push for new rules of engagement around energy infrastructure and shipping lanes, seeking informal understandings that keep these off-limits even in crises.

Internally, they are reassessing missile defense, hardening critical facilities, and considering more diversified export routes that reduce dependence on Hormuz. None of these options are fully reassuring, but together they offer partial risk reduction.

Prospects for Normalization with Iran

Speculation about full normalization, including a non-belligerency pact between Iran and Gulf states, builds on prewar trends of cautious dialogue and economic engagement. Whether this is truly “in the cards” depends on war outcomes, Iran’s internal politics, and Gulf threat perceptions: if Tehran’s regime survives but remains hostile, Gulf states will likely revert to hedging—combining deterrence, limited engagement, and outreach to outside powers.

A more pragmatic Iranian leadership could make structured security arrangements and phased confidence-building measures more plausible over time.

No Return to Status Quo Ante

The Gulf States will not return to the prewar status quo; instead, they are likely to pursue a more diversified security architecture, combining a thinner US shield with expanded ties to China, Russia, and Asian importers. This shift will gradually dilute Washington’s centrality in Gulf security, complicating US force posture and Israel’s assumption of automatic Arab backing against Iran.

For Israel, a more cautious, risk-averse Gulf may limit overt strategic alignment, while for the US, enduring mistrust will make coalition-building for future crises far more difficult.

Trump’s Iran adventure is not an isolated blunder but the latest, and perhaps most explosive, expression of his assault on an already fragile global order. By discarding restraint, sidelining allies, and weaponizing American power for short-term political gain, he has accelerated the erosion of US credibility, fractured Western alliances, and opened new strategic space for Russia and China. The Gulf States are simply the newest casualties of this disorder: their cities struck, economies shaken, and security assumptions shattered.

Whatever emerges from this war, it will not be a restored status quo, but a more fragmented, volatile Middle East in which Israel and the United States confront a diminished margin for error and a far narrower circle of willing, trusting partners.

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a retired professor of international relations, most recently at the Center for Global Affairs at New York University (NYU). He taught courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies.

alon@alonben-meir.com

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

By Jomo Kwame Sundaram and Kuhaneetha Bai Kalaicelvan
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia, Mar 31 2026 (IPS)

While media coverage of Iran’s restrictions on passage through the Hormuz Straits focuses on fuel prices, partial closure is also disrupting crucial fertiliser and other supplies, risking catastrophe for billions worldwide.

Jomo Kwame Sundaram

Hormuz chokepoint
Since the war began, only a few of the hundred or so vessels, previously passing through the narrow Straits of Hormuz daily, still do so.

Hormuz is not just a chokepoint on a shipping lane for oil and gas; it has strategic implications for fertiliser, helium, and other energy-intensive exports as well as for food and other imports to the region.

Higher energy costs affect most transportation and farming requirements, such as tilling and harvesting, as well as fertiliser supplies.

Wars, especially protracted ones, have lasting effects, including for agrifood systems. Without earlier investments, output elsewhere cannot be easily increased.

Alternative fertiliser supply sources are not readily available, especially as agro-ecological options have rarely been seriously pursued despite their proven viability.

As with renewable energy generation to reduce the need for petroleum imports, it is unclear whether the looming food crisis will accelerate the needed and feasible agro-ecological transition for enhanced food security.

Disrupted food supplies
Shipping delays and port congestion disrupt food supplies, trade and availability.

K Kuhaneetha Bai

The Gulf’s populations, augmented by millions of migrant workers, have become reliant on food imports for wheat, rice, soy, sugar, cooking oil, meat, animal feed and more.

Many states have recently tried to improve their food security, expanding strategic reserves, investing in food agriculture and alternative supply routes.

Such measures have improved resilience but cannot address a prolonged blockade of the Persian Gulf. About 70% of the food for Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the Gulf emirates passes through Hormuz.

Replacing disrupted food imports for about 100 million people would require moving almost 100 million kilograms (kg) of food into the region daily by other means.

Supplying food to the Gulf region under blockade would require an unprecedented operation, possibly through contested airspace.

In 2024, the UN World Food Programme delivered about 7 million kg of food daily to 81 million people in 71 countries.

Weather-driven food shortages and price spikes triggered political instability in 2008 and 2010-11. With food systems worldwide increasingly vulnerable to climate shocks, food insecurity threatens regimes everywhere.

Fertilisers
Farmers worldwide need stable supplies of fertilisers and fuel.

The Iran war threatens to disrupt these supplies, so crucial to agricultural production. Staple crops like wheat, rice and maize rely heavily on fertilisers.

Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and Bahrain all ship petroleum products through Hormuz, including a fifth of the world’s liquefied natural gas (LNG).

As LNG is key to producing many fertilisers, Gulf exports have become more significant, especially after the war cut Ukraine’s exports, and China and Russia reduced theirs as well.

In 2024, the Middle East accounted for almost 30% of major fertiliser exports, including nitrogen, phosphate and potash.

The Gulf alone exported 23% of the world’s ammonia and 34% of its urea, while 30-40% of the world’s nitrogen fertiliser exports pass through Hormuz!

In mid-2025, Kpler estimated that a Hormuz closure could reduce fertiliser supplies by 33%, with sulphur-based ones falling by 44% and urea by 30%.

Reduced nitrogen-based fertiliser exports would hurt major food exporters such as Brazil, the US, Thailand, and India, all heavily reliant on fertiliser imports. However, the impact of shortages may be delayed until imported stocks run out.

As the war drags on, farmers may cut fertiliser use by planting less or switching to crops requiring less. Poorer harvests would, in turn, adversely affect later investment, planting and fertiliser use.

Who suffers most?
The economic consequences of the unprovoked US-Israeli assault on Iran and Tehran’s responses are spreading fast and catastrophically, especially for the most vulnerable.

Iran’s new leadership mistrusts Washington and will keep Hormuz closed – choking fuel, food, and fertiliser flows through it – to secure the guarantees it needs to reduce its vulnerability.

As attacks on Iran continued, Tehran stepped up targeted attacks on infrastructure in the Gulf kingdoms hosting US military facilities. US-led efforts have provided little relief to its allies.

The worldwide impact is uneven, with the poorest taking the brunt. Asia and Africa have been hard hit by heavy reliance on oil, gas, and fertiliser imports.

Rich nations’ aid cuts to increase military spending have worsened poverty and hunger for millions, many of whom are also victims of war and aggression.

Unlike the rich, many migrant workers in the Gulf who cannot leave will struggle to make ends meet and send money home to their families.

And as the world’s attention has turned to the Gulf, Israel has worsened conditions in Gaza while taking over southern Lebanon and increasing Yemen’s pain.

Concerned about retribution in November’s mid-term elections, the White House is keen on a ceasefire.

But it has not offered terms acceptable to Iran, which remains suspicious of the US commitment to its own promises, let alone the rule of law.

Hence, the Iranian leadership is unlikely to agree to a ceasefire without credible guarantees for its future security from renewed Israeli and US aggression.

The Iran war has highlighted, yet again, the collateral damage of war and the food system’s vulnerability. Meanwhile, the suffering of the more vulnerable is ignored by the greater powers, who pay little heed to their plight.

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');   Related Articles

• Massive US War Spending Hike Raises Debt, Taxes, Doubts
• Weaponizing Food Worsens Starvation
• New Geopolitics Worse for Global South
• The Global South in the New Cold War
• IMF Urges Non-alignment in Second Cold War
• Industrial Policy, East or West, for Development or War?
• Sanctions Now Weapons of Mass Starvation
• War or Peace, Barbarism or Hope
• Struggle for the Future of Food
• Economic Crisis Can Trigger World War

Its northern Kurdistan Region is being hit by both sides.

An unmaned surface vessel struck sanctioned Russian LNG tanker Arctic Metagaz in the Mediterranean east of Malta during the night of 2-3 March. The attack on the vessel involved in the illegal transport of Russian gas was the first of [...]

Having joined Syria's interior ministry, Yusra Dhiyab al-Qataneh was promoted to the rank of colonel on 14 March by powerful [...]

A recent visitor to the US defence mission in Tbilisi was left dumbfounded. Whereas two years ago the mission had [...]

A study by the Japanese parliament, using previously unpublished figures, shows that the Naichō, or Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office [...]

The possible reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to maritime [...]

Who will determine the fate of the Islamic Republic?

Baghdad slides into a conflict it long wanted to escape.

The end of the dream of economic integration.

Access to education means little if girls are denied protection from harassment, cyber-bullying, and online sexual exploitation.

Auf den Spuren eines verschwiegenen Netzwerks von Regimeunterstützern, das seit dem Irankrieg stärker in den Fokus der Sicherheitsbehörden geraten ist.

Le Sénat a voté mardi pour interdire les réseaux sociaux aux mineurs de moins de 15 ans sous certaines conditions, montrant néanmoins des divergences juridiques avec le gouvernement et le président Emmanuel Macron, qui a fait de cette réforme une promesse de fin de quinquennat.

Après la séance de reconnaissance de terrain, lundi 30 mars au Mexique, le sélectionneur de la RDC, Sébastien Desabre, a assuré que ses joueurs sont prêts pour affronter la Jamaïque.

Il s’est exprimé devant la presse congolaise et étrangère, soulignant que ce match s’annonce particulièrement disputé.

Le technicien français reconnaît que la tâche ne sera pas simple :

The country of 8 million is still dealing with the impacts of a post-COVID crisis that was marked by high inflation and a collapse in the value of the kip.

‎Le Centre hospitalier universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo a présenté, ce 30 mars 2026, ses principaux investissements réalisés en 2025 en matière d'équipements médicaux et de réhabilitation des services. À travers une visite guidée suivie d'une conférence de presse, la direction générale a mis en lumière les acquis techniques et infrastructurels destinés à améliorer la qualité de la prise en charge des patients.

‎Le directeur général du Centre hospitalier universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo (CHU-YO), Ousmane Néré, a d'abord conduit les journalistes à travers plusieurs services rénovés ou récemment équipés avant de rappeler l'ampleur de l'activité de l'hôpital au cours de l'année 2025 et de conduire “ Le devoir de redevabilité nous impose de rendre compte à la hiérarchie et à la population des grandes activités réalisées au cours de l'année écoulée”, a déclaré le directeur général qui a souligné que l'établissement demeure “l'hôpital leader” du Burkina Faso. Selon les données présentées, le CHU Yalgado Ouédraogo a enregistré 140 157 consultations, 12 728 interventions chirurgicales et 577 650 examens en 2025, dont 543 325 examens de laboratoire et plus de 34 000 examens en imagerie médicale.

Dans le détail, les performances en radiologie montrent 11 725 examens scanner réalisés sur l'année, avec des pics hebdomadaires atteignant 350 examens, ainsi que 1 276 IRM. Pour la direction, la réduction des coûts de ces examens a permis aux ménages d'économiser plus de 586 millions de FCFA.

Mais au-delà du bilan statistique, c'est surtout la modernisation du plateau technique qui a retenu l'attention des journalistes. La visite guidée a débuté au service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, où le spécialiste Abel Sawadogo a présenté un appareil de dernière génération également appelé FibroTouch. Cet équipement permet d'évaluer de manière non invasive l'élasticité du foie et la quantité de graisse qu'il contient, facilitant ainsi le diagnostic des pathologies hépatiques. “Cet appareil nous permet aujourd'hui de mieux apprécier l'état du foie sans recourir immédiatement à des procédures plus invasives”, a expliqué le médecin, précisant que l'examen est accessible et subventionné à 17 500 FCFA, un tarif destiné à favoriser l'accès du plus grand nombre.

“Au cours de l'année 2025, le CHUYO a procédé au recrutement de 89 agents, contribuant ainsi à la réduction de la non employabilité des jeunes”, a indiqué Ousmane Néré

La délégation s'est ensuite rendue au service de cardiologie, où le professeur Valentin Yameogo a présenté un nouvel échographe de haute performance. Là aussi, le coût de l'examen est subventionné à 17 500 FCFA. Pour le chef de service, cet équipement renforce considérablement les capacités de diagnostic. “Il permet une lecture plus fine des anomalies cardiaques et réduit les délais de prise en charge”, a-t-il expliqué.

A lire : Santé/CHU Yalgado Ouédraogo : Le bilan des innovations et des actions en 2024 dévoilé

Le parcours des journalistes s'est poursuivi au service de chirurgie générale et digestive, dirigé par le professeur Edgar Ouangré. Ici, les journalistes ont découvert une nouvelle salle opératoire entièrement rénovée et équipée. Cette infrastructure porte à cinq le nombre total de salles opératoires du service. Selon les responsables, cet investissement doit permettre de mieux absorber le volume des interventions programmées et de réduire les délais d'attente des patients. La chirurgie générale et digestive demeure en effet l'un des pôles les plus sollicités de l'établissement.

Au service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale, le professeur Tarcissus Konseim a présenté des locaux entièrement réhabilités, avec une capacité d'accueil renforcée et un meilleur confort pour les malades. “Ce type de confort n'est pas exceptionnel, mais si vous ne l'aviez pas et que vous l'obtenez, ça devient exceptionnel”, a-t-il commenté, en insistant sur la portée concrète de ces améliorations pour les patients hospitalisés.

L'appareil de dernière génération appelé FibrosTouch permet d'évaluer l'élasticité du foie et la quantité de gras sur le foie

Plus de 400 millions de FCFA en matériels médico-techniques en 2025

Dans son intervention devant les hommes de média, le directeur général du CHU-YO a également rappelé que le CHU a bénéficié en 2025 de matériels médico-techniques d'une valeur de plus de 400 millions de FCFA, acquis grâce à l'Initiative présidentielle pour la santé. L'extension des arrivées d'oxygène sur 118 lits dans les services d'urgence et d'hospitalisation fait également partie des avancées mises en avant. Cette mesure vise à réduire les délais de transfert et à améliorer la prise en charge des patients nécessitant une assistance respiratoire. Ousmane Néré a aussi répondu aux critiques souvent adressées à l'hôpital, notamment sur la saturation des services. “Quoique l'hôpital Yalgado soit critiqué, ce sont les travailleurs de Yalgado qui acceptent de traiter les patients à terre pendant qu'ils sont rejetés ailleurs quand il n'y a pas de place”, a-t-il affirmé au cours des échanges.

Par cette déclaration, il a voulu rappeler la pression permanente qui pèse sur le principal centre hospitalier universitaire du pays, souvent dernier recours pour les cas graves ou complexes. Dans le même registre, il a défendu le niveau d'expertise du personnel médical. “Les meilleurs spécialistes sont à Yalgado. Nous le disons et nous mettons au défi les autres hôpitaux, qu'ils viennent démontrer le contraire”.

Un nouveau bloc opératoire au service de chirurgie générale et digestive

L'année 2025 a également été marquée par l'élargissement de l'unité de dialyse avec quatre générateurs supplémentaires, permettant la prise en charge régulière de 331 patients, même si plus de 400 personnes restent en attente. En oncologie, 550 nouveaux cas ont été enregistrés et 952 séances de chimiothérapie réalisées. Le CHU a aussi accompagné 2 370 patients indigents et personnes déplacées internes à travers son service social.

• A lire : Burkina/Santé : Au CHU Yalgado, le Dr Adama Zango redonne forme aux visages détruits par des drames

Pour 2026, la direction annonce plusieurs priorités : poursuite de la réhabilitation des infrastructures, modernisation de l'odontostomatologie, de la pneumologie et de l'oncologie, informatisation progressive des services et développement du paiement électronique. L'aménagement de la cour de l'hôpital figure également parmi les projets annoncés, tout comme l'extension de la dispensation individuelle nominative des médicaments.

Farida Thiombiano
Lefaso.net