For the past three years, Ukraine has not allowed Russia to win its illegal war of aggression. During long periods of the war, the parties have found themselves in a military and diplomatic stalemate. Now US President Donald Trump has sided with the aggressor. “Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine”, the principle that has guided Western policy since February 2022, no longer applies for Washington. Trump has fundamentally changed both the international environment in which war is taking place and the balance between the parties, paving the way for Russia to dictate the terms of peace. To prevent this from happening, swift and decisive European action is essential. The new German government must play a key role here – and it must do so from its very first day in office.
The integration of diverse knowledges is considered essential in ocean governance to understand and address the complex and transboundary changes affecting oceans and societies. In this line, also the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Development (2021–2030) calls for “the science we need for the ocean we want” (UNESCO, n.d.) and the 5th International Polar Year (2032–2033) evolves around “the urgent need for coordinated international research to tackle the biggest challenges of polar research, for both the Polar Regions themselves and for the world as a whole” (International Polar Year, n.d.). This thematic issue derives from the notion that the coordination and integration of diverse knowledges to develop advanced understandings is a political process shaped by, amongst other things, societal inequalities and different forms of governance. To assess the implication of this notion for the governance of the oceans—the “common heritage of humankind” (United Nations Law of the Sea)—this thematic issue explores knowledge integration processes in ocean governance. It sheds light on different governance formats, the role of participatory and co‐creative approaches to knowledge integration, their potentials, limitations, and related micropolitics.
The integration of diverse knowledges is considered essential in ocean governance to understand and address the complex and transboundary changes affecting oceans and societies. In this line, also the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Development (2021–2030) calls for “the science we need for the ocean we want” (UNESCO, n.d.) and the 5th International Polar Year (2032–2033) evolves around “the urgent need for coordinated international research to tackle the biggest challenges of polar research, for both the Polar Regions themselves and for the world as a whole” (International Polar Year, n.d.). This thematic issue derives from the notion that the coordination and integration of diverse knowledges to develop advanced understandings is a political process shaped by, amongst other things, societal inequalities and different forms of governance. To assess the implication of this notion for the governance of the oceans—the “common heritage of humankind” (United Nations Law of the Sea)—this thematic issue explores knowledge integration processes in ocean governance. It sheds light on different governance formats, the role of participatory and co‐creative approaches to knowledge integration, their potentials, limitations, and related micropolitics.
The integration of diverse knowledges is considered essential in ocean governance to understand and address the complex and transboundary changes affecting oceans and societies. In this line, also the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Development (2021–2030) calls for “the science we need for the ocean we want” (UNESCO, n.d.) and the 5th International Polar Year (2032–2033) evolves around “the urgent need for coordinated international research to tackle the biggest challenges of polar research, for both the Polar Regions themselves and for the world as a whole” (International Polar Year, n.d.). This thematic issue derives from the notion that the coordination and integration of diverse knowledges to develop advanced understandings is a political process shaped by, amongst other things, societal inequalities and different forms of governance. To assess the implication of this notion for the governance of the oceans—the “common heritage of humankind” (United Nations Law of the Sea)—this thematic issue explores knowledge integration processes in ocean governance. It sheds light on different governance formats, the role of participatory and co‐creative approaches to knowledge integration, their potentials, limitations, and related micropolitics.
Der neue Koalitionsvertrag steht und gibt erste Hinweise darauf, wie eine künftige CDU/CSU- und SPD-Regierung ihre Beziehungen zu Akteuren im Globalen Süden sowie die Entwicklungspolitik gestalten möchte.
Der neue Koalitionsvertrag steht und gibt erste Hinweise darauf, wie eine künftige CDU/CSU- und SPD-Regierung ihre Beziehungen zu Akteuren im Globalen Süden sowie die Entwicklungspolitik gestalten möchte.
Der neue Koalitionsvertrag steht und gibt erste Hinweise darauf, wie eine künftige CDU/CSU- und SPD-Regierung ihre Beziehungen zu Akteuren im Globalen Süden sowie die Entwicklungspolitik gestalten möchte.
China’s engagement with Africa is often viewed through the lens of state-driven initiatives. This policy brief deconstructs China as a unitary actor by examining the role of Chinese subnational actors, particularly provincial and local governments, in shaping China’s economic engagement with Africa. Using Zhejiang Province as a case study, the policy brief explores the motivations behind Zhejiang’s efforts to foster economic ties and investment in Africa. It highlights the specific tactics employed by the province, including mobilizing city-level governments and entities to facilitate and advance its economic relations with Africa. It demonstrates how Zhejiang’s unique economic structure and position within the Chinese economy shape its distinct interests and approaches in engaging with African partners. These subnational dynamics are crucial for policymakers as they provide a more comprehensive picture of China’s multifaceted foreign engagement efforts.
China’s engagement with Africa is often viewed through the lens of state-driven initiatives. This policy brief deconstructs China as a unitary actor by examining the role of Chinese subnational actors, particularly provincial and local governments, in shaping China’s economic engagement with Africa. Using Zhejiang Province as a case study, the policy brief explores the motivations behind Zhejiang’s efforts to foster economic ties and investment in Africa. It highlights the specific tactics employed by the province, including mobilizing city-level governments and entities to facilitate and advance its economic relations with Africa. It demonstrates how Zhejiang’s unique economic structure and position within the Chinese economy shape its distinct interests and approaches in engaging with African partners. These subnational dynamics are crucial for policymakers as they provide a more comprehensive picture of China’s multifaceted foreign engagement efforts.
China’s engagement with Africa is often viewed through the lens of state-driven initiatives. This policy brief deconstructs China as a unitary actor by examining the role of Chinese subnational actors, particularly provincial and local governments, in shaping China’s economic engagement with Africa. Using Zhejiang Province as a case study, the policy brief explores the motivations behind Zhejiang’s efforts to foster economic ties and investment in Africa. It highlights the specific tactics employed by the province, including mobilizing city-level governments and entities to facilitate and advance its economic relations with Africa. It demonstrates how Zhejiang’s unique economic structure and position within the Chinese economy shape its distinct interests and approaches in engaging with African partners. These subnational dynamics are crucial for policymakers as they provide a more comprehensive picture of China’s multifaceted foreign engagement efforts.
Das Thema Klima und Energie nimmt im soeben von CDU, CSU und SPD vorgestellten Koalitionsvertrag nicht übermäßig viel Raum ein. Die klima- und energiepolitischen Maßnahmen kommentiert Claudia Kemfert, Leiterin der Abteilung Energie, Verkehr, Umwelt im DIW Berlin, wie folgt:
Gut ist, dass die Koalitionsparteien an den Klimazielen und der Erreichung der Klimaneutralität bis 2045 festhalten wollen. Es muss jedoch bezweifelt werden, dass das Klimaziel tatsächlich erreicht werden kann. Dies liegt im Wesentlichen daran, dass sowohl im Gebäude- als auch im Verkehrssektor Maßnahmen ergriffen werden sollen, die diese Ziele konterkarieren. Insbesondere die Abschaffung des Heizungsgesetzes ist höchst problematisch, dies führt zu unnötigen Verzögerungen, zu Verunsicherung von Gebäudeeigentümern und zieht hohe Kosten nach sich. Die angestrebten Maßnahmen lassen befürchten, dass gerade im Gebäudebereich die nötigen Emissionsminderungsziele nicht erreicht werden können, was Strafzahlungen nach sich ziehen würde.CDU, CSU und SPD haben den Koalitionsvertrag präsentiert. Marcel Fratzscher, Präsident des Deutschen Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), kommentiert dies wie folgt:
The role of permanent carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere is currently the subject of intensive discussion within the context of developing a new EU emissions reduction target for 2040 and a German long-term strategy on negative emissions. At the same time, a short-term strategy for the coming years is needed to ensure the successful scaling of technologies for what can be called “industrial CDR”. So far, the focus has tended to be on a conceptual discussion of the quantities of CDR that are required to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions; as a result, sufficient attention has not been paid to the question of how and on what time horizon the first large-scale CDR projects can come into being. Some countries have already developed short-term instruments aimed at triggering an initial investment drive into industrial CDR. A comparative assessment of these approaches reveals several viable policy options for targeted CDR scaling in both the EU and Germany.