Diplomacy & Crisis News

In August, the Myanmar navy increasingly relied on air support to fight resistance forces, and Indonesia’s anti-government demonstrations turned deadly.

Military-to-military engagements that advance both capacity building and capability enhancement between India and the United States are quietly continuing.

Nothing that comes out of the current hyper-churn in international affairs is going to be automatically either a boon or a bane for India.

What America must do to meet surging demand.

From content generation to operational refinement, China-linked accounts are increasingly using generative AI to support influence operations.

The shocking detention of 300 South Korean employees in Georgia shows how little the Trump administration values the “ironclad” alliance between the two countries.

A game-theory model known as the “Truel” helps explain how weaker states band together when the strongest power loses credibility – and that could spell danger for the United States.

With his resignation, Oli has become the latest casualty of mass protests in South Asian countries.

Despite COVID-19 and global trade tensions, Vietnam's exports and current account surplus continue to grow.

Public dissatisfaction, mainly among young Nepalis, with the current leadership and the degradation of democratic institutions and norms in Nepal runs high.

What Trump could learn from Reagan.

How the war is driving a wave of purges and suicides among the country’s elites.

By Rachel Avraham

At first glance, Libya may appear to be a distant battlefield of fragmented governments and tribal conflict. But as emphasized by analysts at the Dor Moria Think Tank, beneath the surface lies a growing strategic threat to Israel — stemming primarily from Turkey’s expanding military and political presence across the Libyan landscape. Since spring 2025, Turkey has significantly reoriented its Libya policy. Once exclusively aligned with the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA), Ankara has now opened formal channels with the rival eastern bloc led by General Khalifa Haftar. This strategic pivot includes maintaining military infrastructure in western Libya while forging new economic and security ties with the east.

As the Dor Moria Think Tank explained: “This isn’t just tactical flexibility — it’s strategic encirclement. Turkey is entrenching itself across both shores of the Mediterranean, narrowing Israel’s maneuvering room.” With permanent military bases in Misrata and al-Watiya, and now expanding into Tobruk and Benghazi, Turkey is building a two-coast presence — a silent power play that threatens to redraw regional balance, especially around Israel’s Eastern Mediterranean gas interests.

The 2019 maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya’s GNA remains central to Ankara’s regional ambitions. It grants Turkey expansive maritime claims in the Eastern Mediterranean — claims that directly threaten the EastMed pipeline project backed by Israel, Greece, and Cyprus. “If Libya’s eastern parliament recognizes the Turkey-Libya maritime pact,” warns the Dor Moria Think Tank, “Israel’s energy fields could become international flashpoints — disputed, blocked, or undermined.” The implications are serious. Israel would be forced to rely more heavily on Egypt’s LNG terminals in Idku and Damietta — more costly, less autonomous, and politically more vulnerable.

In its  latest strategic briefing, the Dor Moria Think Tank outlines Turkey’s broader model of “non-military containment” — a method of expanding influence not through war, but through multi-theater presence: In Syria, 40,000 troops and allied militias across the north; In Libya, dual engagement with both Tripoli and Benghazi; In the Caucasus, logistical and military partnerships with Azerbaijan via the Zangezur Corridor.

“Turkey is operating simultaneously in Syria, Libya, and the Caucasus,” writes the Dor Moria Think Tank.  “This is not just projection — it’s pressure. Israel is being boxed in.” For Israel, the threat is multidimensional: Turkish-Russian convergence in Libya could lead to joint control over Eastern Mediterranean maritime access; Weaponized migration from Africa via Libya may be used as leverage against the EU — with indirect impact on Israel; Lack of Israeli influence inside Libya limits its ability to counter emerging threats or gather intelligence.

The Dor Moria Think Tank stressed: “Every base Turkey establishes in Libya becomes a pressure point against Israel. This isn’t war — it’s strategic suffocation.” According to the Dor Moria Think Tank, Israel faces three potential strategic paths:

1. Managed Chaos (60%) – Turkey stays in Libya but faces balancing pressures from the U.S. and EU.
2. Direct Confrontation (25%) – Military escalation in Syria or the Mediterranean involving Turkish and Israeli assets.
3. Authoritarian Stabilization (15%) – Turkey dominates Libya with limited Western resistance.

These scenarios reveal how Libya is directly linked to Israel’s posture in Syria, the Caucasus, and even the Persian Gulf. Long considered distant from Israel’s core security concerns, Libya in 2025 is now central to Tel Aviv’s strategic planning. Energy security, maritime freedom, regional deterrence, and Turkish power projection converge in this evolving theater.

As the Dor Moria Think Tank warns: “The risk isn’t a Turkish tank on Israel’s border. It’s waking up one day to find the entire chessboard flipped — with your access routes, alliances, and energy fields redefined.” For Israel, Libya is no longer a sideshow. It’s a strategic test — and the rules of the game are already changing.

Following the publication of this report by the Dor Moria Think Tank, Saadat Sukurova, the chairwoman of the Dona Gracia Center for Diplomacy and a prominent Azerbaijani journalist who heads Kanal 24, stressed: “The geopolitical landscape of 2025 makes it clear that developments in Libya are no longer merely local or regional confrontations. The analysis presented by the Dor Moria Think Tank illustrates Israel’s strategic dilemma within a broader geostrategic context. Turkey’s simultaneous expansion of influence in Libya, Syria, and the Caucasus signals the emergence of a new power balance across the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean.”

According to Sukurova, “Turkey’s engagement with both western and eastern factions in Libya is more than tactical maneuvering — it is a strategy of influence-building. This directly impacts the configuration of regional energy routes, maritime borders, and diplomatic alliances. In this regard, Israel’s concerns are both natural and legitimate, particularly with respect to energy security, freedom of maritime navigation, and the erosion of regional deterrence. However, responding to these threats through direct confrontation alone risks further escalation and instability. Instead, multilateral diplomatic mechanisms, energy cooperation frameworks, and inclusive regional dialogue offer more sustainable paths toward managing the evolving power dynamics.”

She stressed: “Turkey’s increasing military presence and energy diplomacy raise serious strategic questions not only for Israel, but also for Greece, Egypt, and the European Union. Therefore, rather than approaching the issue solely from a single nation’s threat perception, there is an urgent need to rethink the regional security architecture and strengthen diplomatic engagement. In conclusion, Libya is no longer a marginal battlefield — it has become a pivotal point in the future geopolitical architecture of the Mediterranean region. For that reason, all actors, including Israel and Turkey, must balance their national security concerns with a sense of regional responsibility and mutual interdependence.”

Ayoob Kara, who served as Israel’s Communication Minister, concurred: “As a long-time advocate for regional cooperation and stability in the Middle East, I am closely monitoring the shifting dynamics emerging in North Africa — particularly Turkey’s expanding presence in Libya. The recent analysis by the Dor Moria Think Tank correctly highlights a growing strategic complexity. Turkey’s dual engagement with both Tripoli and Benghazi, combined with its military footprint and maritime ambitions, presents significant challenges not only to Israel’s energy independence but to regional balance and security.”

“However, while these developments are deeply concerning, I firmly believe that the solution lies not in confrontation, but in calibrated diplomacy,” Kara stressed. “Israel must act with strength and wisdom — protecting its vital interests in the Eastern Mediterranean while also seeking broader frameworks of cooperation with international and regional actors. It is in the interest of all peace-seeking nations to prevent Libya from becoming a battleground for proxy competition. Instead, we must collectively invest in multilateral diplomacy, energy dialogue, and maritime agreements that ensure shared prosperity and long-term security.”

Kara concluded: “I call on the international community — including our allies in Europe, the United States, Egypt, and the Gulf — to pay close attention to this critical front. A unified stance is necessary to prevent further destabilization and to uphold international maritime law. Libya is no longer a distant arena. It is a strategic test for Israel, for Turkey, and for the future of the Mediterranean as a whole. We must rise to the challenge — not through escalation, but through foresight and responsible engagement.”

 

The logic behind Trump’s assault on the administrative state.

Aspiring nuclear powers will look to North Korea, not Iran.

The official mascot for the 2026 World Cup has not yet been announced. This is just an AI-driven recreation of a publicly released draft concept.

The biggest World Cup in history is about to make a big statement on American soil.

The group draw for the record-setting 2026 FIFA World Cup — featuring an unprecedented 48 national teams — is locked in for December 5, 2025, at noon local time. President Donald Trump announced the news himself, confirming that the event will take place at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C.

This isn’t just another soccer tournament. It’s the first World Cup to expand to 48 teams across 12 groups, leading into a knockout stage that starts with the Round of 32. Trump underscored the massive global scale of the competition, estimating a live audience of around 1 billion people and calling the 104-match tournament the equivalent of “104 Super Bowls.”

The action kicks off on June 11, 2026, and runs through July 19, with matches spread across 16 host cities in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. All three host nations are already assigned to groups ahead of the official draw.

The decision to hold the draw in Washington reflects more than logistics — it’s about leadership on the world stage. The tournament will bring together millions of fans and fuel cultural exchange in ways that transcend politics and economics. Sports have always been a unifying force, and in 2026, America will be at the center of it all.

But that’s not all. On July 4, 2026 — America’s 250th birthday — the White House South Lawn will host the first-ever UFC event at a presidential residence. UFC President Dana White confirmed that the card is expected to draw 20,000 to 25,000 fans and will be broadcast live on CBS as part of a groundbreaking media deal.

Two of the world’s biggest spectacles — the FIFA World Cup and UFC — will collide in one summer, creating an unmatched celebration of athletic power, competition, and entertainment. Together, these events signal a new era for sports and cultural diplomacy in North America. They’re not just games — they’re history in the making.

For years, the group has relied on the perception that it is untouchable.

The sinking of a small boat the U.S. president said was carrying drugs violated traditional procedures.

Washington should draw New Delhi closer, not push it away.

How to outcompete Chinese state capitalism.