You are here

Diplomacy & Crisis News

How to Survive a Constitutional Crisis

Foreign Affairs - Fri, 18/04/2025 - 06:00
The three guardrails that can save American democracy.

What America Gets Wrong About the AI Race

Foreign Affairs - Fri, 18/04/2025 - 06:00
Winning means deploying, not just developing, the best technology.

Is Israel Preparing for a Long-term Occupation of Gaza?

Foreign Policy - Fri, 18/04/2025 - 00:30
Palestinian American peace activist Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib discusses where he thinks the war is heading.

Europe Pushes U.S. to Take Tougher Stance on Russia

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 23:50
U.S., French, and Ukrainian officials meet in Paris for discussions on how to end the Russia-Ukraine war.

Can a Conservative Win Back Canada?

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 21:21
Pierre Poilievre’s path to power looked assured—until Donald Trump returned.

Trump’s Trade Policies Keep Undercutting His Own Goals

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 19:57
Trump’s tariffs are set to make reshoring harder and trade deficits bigger.

Why No One Has Ever Heard of the A-3 Skywarrior

The National Interest - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 19:00
Topic: Aircraft Blog Brand: The Buzz Region: Americas Tags: A-3 Skywarrior, Air Warfare, Carrier Aircraft, U.S. Navy, and Vietnam War Why No One Has Ever Heard of the A-3 Skywarrior April 17, 2025 By: Harrison Kass Share Astonishingly, the A-3 was not equipped with ejection seats, leading Navy service members to joke morbidly that the A-3D variant stood for “All Three Dead.”

The Douglas A-3 Skywarrior often gets lost in the shuffle. Most have never heard of the Navy’s Cold War-era strategic bomber, despite the fact that the A-3 served for over three decades. The reason is hard to say. Though the aircraft served a distinguished career, it never had a breakout moment as many of its contemporaries did. And perhaps the A-3’s routine appearance contributed to the jet’s diminished standing.

In any case, the A-3 has long stood in the shadow of other Navy jets, like the A-4, A-6, F-14, and F/A-18. Let’s take a closer look at the A-3, the Navy’s somewhat forgotten carrier-capable bomber.

Remembering the A-3 Skywarrior

The first thing one tends to notice about the A-3 is the aggressively swept wings, which were shoulder-mounted at a 36-degree angle. Beneath each wing lay a single Pratt & Whitney J57 turbojet engine. The fuselage of the aircraft appeared fairly pedestrian, with a conventional semi-monocoque design. The A-3 featured a single vertical stabilizer, again enhancing the routines of the jet’s appearance.

The original A-3 variants were designed to accommodate three crew members—a pilot, bombardier/navigator, and crewman/navigator. The pilot and bombardier/navigator sat side-by-side, where the pilot had full flight controls. The crewman/navigator sat behind the pilot in an aft-facing, or rear-facing, seat. In early variants of the A-3, the third crewman in the back also operated twin 20-mm cannons mounted in the tail; in later variants of the plane, the cannons were removed to make room for ECM equipment.

Astonishingly, the A-3 was not equipped with ejection seats, leading Navy service members to joke morbidly that the A-3D variant stood for “All Three Dead.”

The omission of ejection seats was not an oversight, but a careful decision (if a poor one). In order to qualify for carrier operations, the aircraft needed to be below a certain weight threshold to qualify for carrier operations; the bulk of the ejection seats was deemed expendable because the A-3 was expected to conduct the majority of its operations at high altitude. Of course, the most dangerous moments of any flight are take-off and landing, each of which occurs at low altitude—making the rationale that the A-3 did not need ejection seats fairly absurd. 

Operating the A-3 Skywarrior

The A-3’s most enduring claim to fame, perhaps, is that in the first decades of the Cold War, the A-3 was the Navy’s contribution to the U.S. nuclear deterrence scheme. As one of the only aircraft that could both carry a nuclear weapon and take off from an aircraft carrier, it formed the third leg of America’s rudimentary nuclear “triad.” In that role, it would later be supplanted by nuclear-equipped submarines.

Thankfully, the A-3 was never called upon to deploy nuclear weapons—only conventional weapons, of which the A-3 could lift 12,000 pounds of, in the fuselage bomb bay. The A-3 was used for conventional bombing during the Vietnam War. A-3s were also found valuable for their utility; later A-3 variants were converted for use in aerial refueling, photo reconnaissance, and electronic intelligence. 

Despite maintaining a low profile, the A-3 served for decades. A few EA-3Bs used for electronic intelligence even served in the 1991 Gulf War. The last of the type were retired later the same year, in September 1991, ending a more-than three-decade run for the unassuming A-3. Since retirement, the A-3 has continued serving—as a civilian operated testbed for the development of various weapons systems. Not a bad run for a jet no one’s ever heard of.  

About the Author: Harrison Kass

Harrison Kass is a senior defense and national security writer with over 1,000 total pieces on issues involving global affairs. An attorney, pilot, guitarist, and minor pro hockey player, Harrison joined the US Air Force as a Pilot Trainee but was medically discharged. Harrison holds a BA from Lake Forest College, a JD from the University of Oregon, and an MA from New York University. Harrison listens to Dokken.

Image: Wikimedia Commons.

The post Why No One Has Ever Heard of the A-3 Skywarrior appeared first on The National Interest.

How Generations of Experts Built U.S. Power

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 18:50
And now Trump is throwing it all away.

Trump Is About to Learn That Iran Is a Problem Without a Solution

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 18:44
A second round of nuclear talks will be held this weekend.

How Far Will the U.S.-China Trade War Go?

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 18:21
The White House may have miscalculated Beijing’s ability to endure pain—and a popular mood to stand up to Trump.

How Noboa Avoided the Incumbency Trap

Foreign Policy - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 15:52
Latin American voters tend to reject ruling parties and politicians. What did Ecuador’s president do differently?

China’s Double Game in Myanmar

Foreign Affairs - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 06:00
How Beijing is manipulating civil conflict to secure regional dominance.

The Russia That Putin Made

Foreign Affairs - Thu, 17/04/2025 - 06:00
Moscow, the West, and coexistence without illusion.

U.S. Eyes Pakistan’s Mineral Wealth

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 23:40
But investment in tapping the country’s reserves would be a dangerous gamble.

Myanmar’s Earthquake Exposes Political Fault Lines

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 23:00
The junta has exploited past crises to reinforce its power—and it can do it again.

Brussels Gambles on Meloni-Trump Meeting to Secure a Trade Deal

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 22:03
However, some are worried that the far-right leader could prioritize Italy’s interests over the European Union’s.

Trump’s Tariffs Hit Hard Tech Realities

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 20:42
China’s role in smartphone and chip supply chains is blunting the U.S. president’s ambitions—at least for now.

Why Authoritarians Attack Universities First

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 20:09
A Yale professor and expert on fascism talks about why he’s leaving the United States under Trump.

Ecuador Sticks With Trump-Friendly President

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 18:52
Incumbent Daniel Noboa won a campaign roiled by transnational gang violence and an energy crisis.

Russia Is Trying to Push River Borders

Foreign Policy - Wed, 16/04/2025 - 18:44
Estonia is dealing with yet more gray-zone aggression from Moscow.

Pages